Prepare to dive into a dreamworld that might leave you feeling a bit underwhelmed. 'In Your Dreams' is a Netflix animation with a familiar ring, and not in a good way. This movie, crafted by a Pixar-trained crew, constantly reminds viewers of other animated classics, which, let's be honest, can be a double-edged sword.
The story revolves around Stevie, a 12-year-old with a wild imagination, and her journey to keep her family together amidst potential divorce. Her parents, once a local music duo, are at odds: Mom wants to move and pursue academia, while Dad, a carefree slacker, prefers to stay put. Stevie, sharing a room with her annoying brother Elliot, finds an escape in dreams, a concept that sounds unique but quickly turns into a 'Inside Out' clone.
As the siblings navigate their shared dreams, the movie presents a series of vibrant scenes that often lack narrative depth. From a land of talking food that turns rotten to a Sandman character voiced by Omid Djalili, the film feels like a hodgepodge of references. And here's where it gets controversial: the Sandman, a supposed guardian of dreams, represents a psychotropic big pharma-like entity, offering a feel-good illusion to heal the family's issues. But is that really the solution?
'In Your Dreams' is a short 77-minute ride, packed with dream sequences, but it lacks the imaginative depth that Pixar is known for. It's like a beautiful surface without the innovative core. And this is the part most people miss: animation is not just about visuals; it's about the story and the world-building beneath.
So, is 'In Your Dreams' worth your time? That's a question for the audience. What do you think? Should animation strive for originality, or is it okay to borrow and blend familiar elements? Let's discuss in the comments!
